Last December, Apple opened a massive new retail store in Manhattan's historic Grand Central Terminal, adding a high-profile presence to the busy commuting, tourist, and shopping hub. Apple's lease agreement with the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) was quickly questioned by government officials, who were concerned that Apple had received favorable treatment during the negotiations and was paying significant lower rent than would otherwise have been expected for the location.

The MTA countered those claims with its own statements outlining how Apple is paying four times as much rent as the restaurant it replaced while also paying $5 million to the restaurant to vacate its lease and investing in building upgrades for the new store. The agency also argued that Apple's presence would indirectly boost terminal revenue through increased traffic at other merchants that, unlike Apple, pay a portion of their revenue to the terminal.

apple store grand central front view
But the New York Post now reports that a state audit of those lease negotiations has determined that Apple did indeed receive an "unfair" edge in what was supposed to be an open competition for the space.

A fresh audit by state Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli says the MTA last May allowed the California-based tech giant to set a daunting hurdle for rival bidders to clear in a tight, 30-day window — namely, that they be willing to front $5 million in cash.

“The competitive process followed by MTA . . . was at a minimum severely slanted toward Apple,” reads the report, submitted to MTA officials Friday and expected to be made public today.

The state comptroller's office has announced the release of the audit report, revealing that Apple and the MTA had been in negotiations for the space for over two years and that Apple had already made payments to the vacating restaurant before the space was publicly opened for proposals.

"While Apple may turn out to be a good tenant, the MTA set a troubling precedent when it played favorites and gave Apple a competitive edge over others for the Grand Central space," DiNapoli said. "Apple was directly involved in setting the terms of the lease and given exclusive access to information more than a year before any other vendor knew the Grand Central location was available. The company even signed a $2 million agreement with the current tenant to vacate its space five days before the MTA issued the RFP.

In response to the audit, the state is proposing increased oversight on competitive public authority contracts, a move which give the comptroller's office more authority to examine such agreements before they are finalized.

In a statement responding to the audit, MTA Chairman and CEO Joseph Lhota called the results "not fact-based" and "worthless", also accusing the comptroller's basis of "overt bias" against both the MTA and Apple in declaring that the process was not open and transparent.

Top Rated Comments

JBunkers Avatar
171 months ago
Who's slanted here?

So the state comptroller conducts an audit which finds that the state comptroller should have more power?

I think the audit is "at a minimum severely slanted toward the Comptroller". :rolleyes:
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)
shartypants Avatar
171 months ago
What a waste of taxpayer money doing the audit, sometimes I think government people just look for ways to justify their jobs instead of doing something useful.
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)
ConCat Avatar
171 months ago
Looks like the free market is dead. Apple got favorable treatment because having an Apple store in you station increases revenue from all of your shops due to increased foot traffic. I don't see how this is any of their concern. Clearly, people have been enjoying the Apple store.

Really, the free market is a beautiful thing. It works well, and both sides are happy. You give me a product or service I want, and I give you money so you can buy a product or service you want. Really, that's all there is to it. We have not lived in a true free market for almost a century now.
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Slovak Avatar
171 months ago
the state is proposing increased oversight on competitive public authority contracts, a move which give the comptroller's office more authority to examine such agreements before they are finalized.

Translation: Nobody asked us, nobody greased our pockets.
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Mad-B-One Avatar
171 months ago
Looks like the free market is dead. Apple got favorable treatment because having an Apple store in you station increases revenue from all of your shops due to increased foot traffic. I don't see how this is any of their concern. Clearly, people have been enjoying the Apple store.

Really, the free market is a beautiful thing. It works well, and both sides are happy. You give me a product or service I want, and I give you money so you can buy a product or service you want. Really, that's all there is to it. We have not lived in a true free market for almost a century now.

I agree with you but I also think that a free market is not needed for Pareto efficiency. To be honest, this was a mutual goal of MTA and Apple to get the store there. The reason why the bidding wasn't "open" is quite simple: No one would be able to outbid the benefits an Apple Store gets to Central Station simply because of the traffic effect. MTA was looking for a magnet, Apple for a location. Now, find one business (other than a casino) that would have the same effect and would pay the renovation needed and can (and is willing to) pay the rent on top of it.

PS: The auditor should also read up on the Nash equilibrium... that would help and point towards the flaws in his arguments.
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Swift Avatar
171 months ago
Politics. If somebody couldn't put up $5 million, how on earth could they lease the space? Who exactly was cut out? Look no further than the Murdoch filth, the NY Post. Is some different series of regulations necessary? Maybe so. Note: this is a great business deal for Grand Central. Any businessman would see that. But apparently, the Post never saw a public bureaucracy they liked. Gee, was Bain Capital thinking of buying Grand Central and moving it to Mexico?
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)

Popular Stories

iPhone 17 Pro 3 4ths Perspective Aluminum Camera Module 1

New iPhone 17 Pro Details: Brighter Display, Best Battery Life, and More

Wednesday September 3, 2025 5:33 am PDT by
Apple's iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone 17 Pro Max models will feature a number of significant display, thermal, and battery improvements, according to new late-stage rumors. According to the Weibo leaker known as "Instant Digital," the iPhone 17 Pro models will feature displays with higher brightness, making it more suitable for use in direct sunlight for prolonged periods. The iPhone 16 Pro and...
iPhone 17 Pro Iridescent Feature 2

iPhone 17 Pro Clear Case Leak Reveals Three Key Changes

Sunday August 31, 2025 1:26 pm PDT by
Apple is expected to unveil the iPhone 17 series on Tuesday, September 9, and last-minute rumors about the devices continue to surface. The latest info comes from a leaker known as Majin Bu, who has shared alleged images of Apple's Clear Case for the iPhone 17 Pro and Pro Max, or at least replicas. Image Credit: @MajinBuOfficial The images show three alleged changes compared to Apple's iP...
iphone 16 pro ghost hand

iPhone 17 Pro: 5 Reasons Not to Upgrade This Year

Monday September 1, 2025 4:35 am PDT by
Apple will launch its new iPhone 17 series this month, and the iPhone 17 Pro models are expected to get a new design for the rear casing and the camera area. But more significant changes to the lineup are not expected until next year, when the iPhone 18 models arrive. If you're thinking of trading in your iPhone for this year's latest, consider the following features rumored to be coming to...
iPhone 17 Pro Iridescent Feature 2

iPhone 17 and iPhone 17 Pro Prices Estimated Ahead of Apple Event Next Week

Tuesday September 2, 2025 1:50 pm PDT by
Just one week before Apple is expected to unveil the iPhone 17 series, an analyst has shared new price estimates for the devices. Here are J.P. Morgan analyst Samik Chatterjee's price estimates for the iPhone 17 series in the United States, according to 9to5Mac: Model Starting Price Model Starting Price Change iPhone 16 $799 iPhone 17 ...
iPhone 17 Pro Dark Blue and Orange

iPhone 17 Release Date, Pre-Orders, and What to Expect

Thursday August 28, 2025 4:08 am PDT by
An iPhone 17 announcement is a dead cert for September 2025 – Apple has already sent out invites for an "Awe dropping" event on Tuesday, September 9 at the Apple Park campus in Cupertino, California. The timing follows Apple's trend of introducing new iPhone models annually in the fall. At the event, Apple is expected to unveil its new-generation iPhone 17, an all-new ultra-thin iPhone 17...
iOS 18 on iPhone Arrow Down

Apple Preparing iOS 18.7 for iPhones as iOS 26 Release Date Nears

Sunday August 31, 2025 4:35 pm PDT by
Apple is preparing to release iOS 18.7 for compatible iPhone models, according to evidence of the update in the MacRumors visitor logs. We expect iOS 18.7 to be released in September, alongside iOS 26. The update will likely include fixes for security vulnerabilities, but little else. iOS 18.7 will be one of the final updates ever released for the iPhone XS, iPhone XS Max, and iPhone XR,...
iPhone 17 Pro on Desk Centered 1

Survey: Nearly 70% of Users Plan to Upgrade to iPhone 17

Monday September 1, 2025 8:24 am PDT by
A new survey has found that nearly seven in ten iPhone owners in the United States plan to upgrade to an iPhone 17 model, signaling strong demand ahead of Apple's expected unveiling of the devices at its September 9 keynote. Smartphone price comparison platform SellCell surveyed over 2,000 U.S.-based iPhone users in August to assess upgrade interest and brand loyalty before Apple's event....