Apple Watch Boosts Verizon Activations Amid Phone and Tablet Subscriber Loss

Verizon, the largest carrier in the United States by subscriber count, saw a monthly subscriber increase of 260,000 during the first quarter of 2018, reports Bloomberg, largely due to an increased number of smart watch activations.

The company actually lost phone and tablet subscribers last quarter, but the dip in subscribers did not hurt its bottom line because of smart watches, wearables, and other connected devices like vehicles.

verizonsubscriberincrease

Image via Bloomberg

Verizon says it added a total of 359,000 subscribers who are using smart watches and other devices during the quarter, making up for the loss of 24,000 phone customers and 75,000 tablet customers.

There was no breakdown in the number of activations by specific device, but Verizon's jump in smart watch subscribers comes following the September release of the Apple Watch Series 3, the first Apple Watch with LTE connectivity.

The Apple Watch Series 3 allows customers to use the Apple Watch sans iPhone for the first time, as it has its own cellular connection. Verizon and other carriers charge customers $10 per month to add a smart watch to an existing smartphone plan.

Verizon shared the numbers during its first quarter 2018 earnings results, released this morning. Verizon stock has since surged as much as 3.6 percent.

Related Roundup: Apple Watch 10
Tag: Verizon

Popular Stories

iPhone 17 Pro Dark Blue and Orange

iPhone 17 Release Date, Pre-Orders, and What to Expect

Thursday August 28, 2025 4:08 am PDT by
An iPhone 17 announcement is a dead cert for September 2025 – Apple has already sent out invites for an "Awe dropping" event on Tuesday, September 9 at the Apple Park campus in Cupertino, California. The timing follows Apple's trend of introducing new iPhone models annually in the fall. At the event, Apple is expected to unveil its new-generation iPhone 17, an all-new ultra-thin iPhone 17...
xiaomi apple ad india

Apple and Samsung Push Back Against Xiaomi's Bold India Ads

Friday August 29, 2025 4:54 am PDT by
Apple and Samsung have reportedly issued cease-and-desist notices to Xiaomi in India for an ad campaign that directly compares the rivals' devices to Xiaomi's products. The two companies have threatened the Chinese vendor with legal action, calling the ads "disparaging." Ads have appeared in local print media and on social media that take pot shots at the competitors' premium offerings. One...
iPhone 17 Pro Iridescent Feature 2

iPhone 17 Pro Clear Case Leak Reveals Three Key Changes

Sunday August 31, 2025 1:26 pm PDT by
Apple is expected to unveil the iPhone 17 series on Tuesday, September 9, and last-minute rumors about the devices continue to surface. The latest info comes from a leaker known as Majin Bu, who has shared alleged images of Apple's Clear Case for the iPhone 17 Pro and Pro Max, or at least replicas. Image Credit: @MajinBuOfficial The images show three alleged changes compared to Apple's iP...
maxresdefault

The MacRumors Show: iPhone 17's 'Awe Dropping' Accessories

Friday August 29, 2025 8:12 am PDT by
Following the announcement of Apple's upcoming "Awe dropping" event, on this week's episode of The MacRumors Show we talk through all of the new accessories rumored to debut alongside the iPhone 17 lineup. Subscribe to The MacRumors Show YouTube channel for more videos We take a closer look at Apple's invite for "Awe dropping;" the design could hint at the iPhone 17's new thermal system with ...

Top Rated Comments

toomanydatsuns Avatar
96 months ago
I don't think people stay with their cellular watch plan long. It's fun for a while then people realize they're wasting money on it.
My exact experience. I wanted stainless, didn't care about LTE. Figured I'd try it because of Verizon's promotion, but... All the apps I use regularly on the watch require a connection to my iPhone to function, so... What's the point? Some future watchOS that allows watch apps to operate more independently from the iPhone would make this really compelling. But then again, so would a first party Podcasts watch app, and we're all still holding our collective breath for that one.

So, right now, it's $10 a month so that I can make and recieve phone calls (which I do maybe twice a month, max), and stream Apple Music in the rare event that I go for an outdoor run somewhere that has good LTE coverage. Not really worth it. At least I get a bright red crown so I can let other people know that I have the new hotness.
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
DEMinSoCAL Avatar
96 months ago
I don't think people stay with their cellular watch plan long. It's fun for a while then people realize they're wasting money on it.
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Appleaker Avatar
96 months ago
People might be trying it out, in the end it’s not going to succeed at the ridiculous $10 a month, especially with ‘increasing’ iPhone costs. It should be $5 and in cases where it’s the same as their phone plan but accessible via the watch, it should be free or at the very most $1 a month.
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
cmwade77 Avatar
96 months ago
Wow, what a way to spin things, all of those watch activations are people who still have phones on Verizon, otherwise the watch service won't work anyway. So ultimately this means that while people added watches, overall they still lost subscribers, they just got some subscribers to add watches.
Score: 2 Votes (Like | Disagree)
TheRealTVGuy Avatar
96 months ago
My exact experience...

So, right now, it's $10 a month so that I can make and recieve phone calls (which I do maybe twice a month, max), and stream Apple Music in the rare event that I go for an outdoor run somewhere that has good LTE coverage. Not really worth it. At least I get a bright red crown so I can let other people know that I have the new hotness.
I know everyone has their own use case, but my experience has been quite the opposite. I’m on the lake quite a bit with my jet ski, and LOVE the fact that I can stay in touch having nothing but my watch on me. Well that and a wetsuit. ;)
Score: 1 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Swift Avatar
96 months ago
The cellular companies hated subsidizing all those iPh es and the premium Androids. But the thing is, it kept me logged into AT&T for years, with my Steve Jobs original account. It tied people in. Now, people are happing in and out like crazy. Since I left AT&T two years ago, I've been with T-Mobile, then I switched to Virgin and took advantage of a plan where the first 6 months would cost you $1 a month. Kept the old iPhone 6 going. Six months and $6 later, I decided to go for the iPhone X. I went to Sprint but then immediately a T-Mobile plan to get two lines and each one costs $35. So I got the iPhone X for $30 a month plus $35 for my line, unlimited everything, and MLB.tv for free. You know, they probably would have done better to give us the phones on the front end and get us paying for it in the back end. You didn't used to be able to switch phones when you felt like it. You could pay after you paid for 23 months. Now, my plan means if I like, I can switch to a newer phone-- the 9, anyone? the XI? -- after a year. To be clear, the relationship with the popular phones was monopolistic. You had to keep the phone, and the network, until it was paid off. Not any more. Guess that special deal you made with Jobs wasn't so bad, after all. And the lost 24,000 phones and tablets? The gaining of hundreds of thousands of phones and tablets is not as important as the leaving of 24,000.
Score: 1 Votes (Like | Disagree)