Apple Online Store Security Flaw Exposed PINs of T-Mobile Customers

A security flaw in Apple's online store exposed the account PINs of more than 72 million T-Mobile customers, reports BuzzFeed News.

The vulnerability was discovered by security researchers Phobia and Nicholas "Convict" Ceraolo, who also found a similar flaw in the website for phone insurance company Asurion that exposed AT&T account PINs.

Both Apple and Asurion fixed the website flaws that left the PINs vulnerable after learning about them from BuzzFeed News. Apple opted not to provide further comment on the situation, but told BuzzFeed News that it is "very grateful to the researchers who found the flaw."

tmobileapplepage

The page on Apple's site that let hackers brute force PINs, via BuzzFeed News

PINs, or passcodes, are numbers that are used as an additional account security measure by many carriers in the United States. Mobile device PINs are typically a last line of defense for a cellular account as both carrier websites and support staff will ask for the PIN for confirmation before making account changes.

SIM hacking, which uses social engineering to get carrier support staff to transfer a person's phone number to a new SIM, has become increasingly prevalent due to the number of accounts (bank, email, social media, etc.) that are tied to a person's phone number. A PIN is used as a defense mechanism against SIM hacking, which means exposed PINs can be particularly dangerous.

Accessing the T-Mobile PINs on Apple's website involved a brute force attack where a hacker used software to input multiple different numeric combinations to guess the proper one.

As BuzzFeed News explains, after initiating a T-Mobile iPhone purchase on the Apple online store and selecting monthly payment options through T-Mobile, Apple's site directs users to an authentication form asking for a T-Mobile number and account PIN or last four digits of a social security number (which most carriers use in place of a PIN when one has not been set).

The page allowed for infinite entry attempts into the PIN field, enabling the brute force attack that let hackers guess PINs associated with a T-Mobile phone number.

The security vulnerability appears to have been limited to T-Mobile accounts, as the same validation page for other carriers on Apple's site uses a rate limit that locks access to the form for 60 minutes after five to 10 incorrect entries. Given that the other carrier pages had rate limiting enabled, it's likely Apple made an error on the T-Mobile page.

According to Ceraolo, the vulnerability is likely due to an engineering mistake made when connecting T-Mobile's account validation API to Apple's website.

A similar vulnerability on Asurion's website exposed an unspecified number of AT&T account PINs. An AT&T spokesperson said that it is working with Asurion to investigate the issue and will "take any additional action that may be appropriate."

A phone number was required for both of these attacks, limiting the number of people who may have been impacted, but AT&T and T-Mobile customers who are concerned about their account safety should choose a new PIN.

Tags: AT&T, T-Mobile

Popular Stories

iPhone 17 Pro Dark Blue and Orange

iPhone 17 Release Date, Pre-Orders, and What to Expect

Thursday August 28, 2025 4:08 am PDT by
An iPhone 17 announcement is a dead cert for September 2025 – Apple has already sent out invites for an "Awe dropping" event on Tuesday, September 9 at the Apple Park campus in Cupertino, California. The timing follows Apple's trend of introducing new iPhone models annually in the fall. At the event, Apple is expected to unveil its new-generation iPhone 17, an all-new ultra-thin iPhone 17...
xiaomi apple ad india

Apple and Samsung Push Back Against Xiaomi's Bold India Ads

Friday August 29, 2025 4:54 am PDT by
Apple and Samsung have reportedly issued cease-and-desist notices to Xiaomi in India for an ad campaign that directly compares the rivals' devices to Xiaomi's products. The two companies have threatened the Chinese vendor with legal action, calling the ads "disparaging." Ads have appeared in local print media and on social media that take pot shots at the competitors' premium offerings. One...
iPhone 17 Pro Iridescent Feature 2

iPhone 17 Pro Clear Case Leak Reveals Three Key Changes

Sunday August 31, 2025 1:26 pm PDT by
Apple is expected to unveil the iPhone 17 series on Tuesday, September 9, and last-minute rumors about the devices continue to surface. The latest info comes from a leaker known as Majin Bu, who has shared alleged images of Apple's Clear Case for the iPhone 17 Pro and Pro Max, or at least replicas. Image Credit: @MajinBuOfficial The images show three alleged changes compared to Apple's iP...
maxresdefault

The MacRumors Show: iPhone 17's 'Awe Dropping' Accessories

Friday August 29, 2025 8:12 am PDT by
Following the announcement of Apple's upcoming "Awe dropping" event, on this week's episode of The MacRumors Show we talk through all of the new accessories rumored to debut alongside the iPhone 17 lineup. Subscribe to The MacRumors Show YouTube channel for more videos We take a closer look at Apple's invite for "Awe dropping;" the design could hint at the iPhone 17's new thermal system with ...

Top Rated Comments

mistasopz Avatar
92 months ago
But forum members told me that Apple had the best security. Well except for those times when they didn't. Like the root password gate where you didn't have to put a password in to gain root access.
Score: 41 Votes (Like | Disagree)
RoobyRoobyRoo Avatar
92 months ago
But forum members told me that Apple had the best security. Well except for those times when they didn't. Like the root password gate where you didn't have to put a password in to gain root access.
Having the best security =/= flawless security. No tech company is completely flawless. But go ahead and chastise Apple for not being absolutely perfect, because that's so productive.
Score: 24 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Doctor Q Avatar
92 months ago
Four digits isn't a very long PIN. Even if the software now locks access to the form for 60 minutes after five to 10 incorrect entries, it doesn't block the exploit, just slow it down.

It seems to me that a bot could try 10 guesses for one phone number, which would lock the form for that phone number, then immediately switch to another phone number. If the phone number is locked for the IP address, it could use another IP address too.

If so, let's try a little math here: Rather than a bot trying one phone number and 10,000 different PINs in rapid succession to break it, it could try five to ten PINs for every phone number it's working on in the first hour, then try another five to ten PINs for every phone number in the second hour, and so on. In as few as 42 days it could crack every phone number. If it was trying to crack 10,000 phone numbers, it would succeed on an average of 238 phone numbers per day. That's still pretty vulnerable.
Score: 17 Votes (Like | Disagree)
mi7chy Avatar
92 months ago
Apple don't care about security because even after several security incidents customers are brain washed into thinking Apple is flawless.
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
zakarhino Avatar
92 months ago
Security issue after security issue for T-Mobile and many carriers in general. Remember when T-Mo Germany said they don't need to salt their passwords because their security is "that good"? Or when it was discovered that it's very easy to get access to a T-Mo account AND clone people's sims because T-Mo doesn't have very good security practices beyond asking for the last 4 of your SSN? I've heard stories of people phoning up carriers under the guise of being a store employee and they get access to all sorts of information without thorough identity verification!

I know Apple are the guys that purportedly screwed up here but when you look at T-Mobile's security in general, it doesn't have a very good track record, it should have never been possible for the Tmo verification API to allow unlimited requests without a time limit. These carriers need to seriously update their security practices. Just accepting the last 4 digits of your social security number is no longer a viable option.
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
nvmls Avatar
92 months ago
Squeeze that privacy/security coin Timo!
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)