Apple's New Transcription APIs Blow Past Whisper in Speed Tests

Apple's new speech-to-text transcription APIs in iOS 26 and macOS Tahoe are delivering dramatically faster speeds compared to rival tools, including OpenAI's Whisper, based on beta testing conducted by MacStories' John Voorhees.

apple record transcribe phone calls

Call recording and transcription in iOS 18.1

Apple uses its own native speech frameworks to power live transcription features in apps like Notes and Voice Memos, as well as phone call transcription in iOS 18.1. To improve efficiency in iOS 26 and macOS Tahoe, Apple has introduced a new SpeechAnalyzer class and SpeechTranscriber module that deal with similar requests.

According to Voorhees, the new models processed a 34-minute, 7GB video file in just 45 seconds using a command line tool called Yap (developed by Voorhees' son, Finn). That's a full 55% faster than MacWhisper's Large V3 Turbo model, which took 1 minute and 41 seconds for the same file.

Other Whisper-based tools performed even slower, with VidCap taking 1:55 and MacWhisper's Large V2 model requiring 3:55 to complete the same transcription task. Voorhees also reported no noticeable difference in transcription quality across models.

The speed advantage comes from Apple's on-device processing approach, which avoids the network overhead that typically slows cloud-based transcription services.

While the time difference might seem modest for individual files, Voorhees notes that the performance gain increases exponentially when processing multiple videos or longer content. For anyone generating subtitles or transcribing lectures regularly, the efficiency boost could save them hours.

The Speech framework components are available across iPhone, iPad, Mac, and Vision Pro platforms in the current beta releases. Voorhees expects Apple's transcription technology to eventually replace Whisper as the go-to solution for Mac transcription apps.

Related Roundups: iOS 26, iPadOS 26, macOS Tahoe 26
Related Forums: iOS 26, macOS Tahoe

Popular Stories

iPhone 17 Pro 3 4ths Perspective Aluminum Camera Module 1

New iPhone 17 Pro Details: Brighter Display, Best Battery Life, and More

Wednesday September 3, 2025 5:33 am PDT by
Apple's iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone 17 Pro Max models will feature a number of significant display, thermal, and battery improvements, according to new late-stage rumors. According to the Weibo leaker known as "Instant Digital," the iPhone 17 Pro models will feature displays with higher brightness, making it more suitable for use in direct sunlight for prolonged periods. The iPhone 16 Pro and...
iPhone 17 Pro Iridescent Feature 2

iPhone 17 Pro Clear Case Leak Reveals Three Key Changes

Sunday August 31, 2025 1:26 pm PDT by
Apple is expected to unveil the iPhone 17 series on Tuesday, September 9, and last-minute rumors about the devices continue to surface. The latest info comes from a leaker known as Majin Bu, who has shared alleged images of Apple's Clear Case for the iPhone 17 Pro and Pro Max, or at least replicas. Image Credit: @MajinBuOfficial The images show three alleged changes compared to Apple's iP...
iphone 16 pro ghost hand

iPhone 17 Pro: 5 Reasons Not to Upgrade This Year

Monday September 1, 2025 4:35 am PDT by
Apple will launch its new iPhone 17 series this month, and the iPhone 17 Pro models are expected to get a new design for the rear casing and the camera area. But more significant changes to the lineup are not expected until next year, when the iPhone 18 models arrive. If you're thinking of trading in your iPhone for this year's latest, consider the following features rumored to be coming to...
iPhone 17 Pro Iridescent Feature 2

iPhone 17 and iPhone 17 Pro Prices Estimated Ahead of Apple Event Next Week

Tuesday September 2, 2025 1:50 pm PDT by
Just one week before Apple is expected to unveil the iPhone 17 series, an analyst has shared new price estimates for the devices. Here are J.P. Morgan analyst Samik Chatterjee's price estimates for the iPhone 17 series in the United States, according to 9to5Mac: Model Starting Price Model Starting Price Change iPhone 16 $799 iPhone 17 ...
iPhone 17 Pro Dark Blue and Orange

iPhone 17 Release Date, Pre-Orders, and What to Expect

Thursday August 28, 2025 4:08 am PDT by
An iPhone 17 announcement is a dead cert for September 2025 – Apple has already sent out invites for an "Awe dropping" event on Tuesday, September 9 at the Apple Park campus in Cupertino, California. The timing follows Apple's trend of introducing new iPhone models annually in the fall. At the event, Apple is expected to unveil its new-generation iPhone 17, an all-new ultra-thin iPhone 17...
iOS 18 on iPhone Arrow Down

Apple Preparing iOS 18.7 for iPhones as iOS 26 Release Date Nears

Sunday August 31, 2025 4:35 pm PDT by
Apple is preparing to release iOS 18.7 for compatible iPhone models, according to evidence of the update in the MacRumors visitor logs. We expect iOS 18.7 to be released in September, alongside iOS 26. The update will likely include fixes for security vulnerabilities, but little else. iOS 18.7 will be one of the final updates ever released for the iPhone XS, iPhone XS Max, and iPhone XR,...
iPhone 17 Pro on Desk Centered 1

Survey: Nearly 70% of Users Plan to Upgrade to iPhone 17

Monday September 1, 2025 8:24 am PDT by
A new survey has found that nearly seven in ten iPhone owners in the United States plan to upgrade to an iPhone 17 model, signaling strong demand ahead of Apple's expected unveiling of the devices at its September 9 keynote. Smartphone price comparison platform SellCell surveyed over 2,000 U.S.-based iPhone users in August to assess upgrade interest and brand loyalty before Apple's event....

Top Rated Comments

Big_D Avatar
11 weeks ago
Impressive, if it is accurate. What the story doesn't mention is how accurate each of those transcriptions was? Were they all identical? Did one or other have more mistakes? What is the accuracy percentage for each one, and how badly wrong were those mistakes?

I'm not trying to defend ChatGPT, just the speed is a single metric, which isn't very useful if the results are garbage. If the Apple one is faster and more accurate, that is incredible, faster and as accurate, impressive, faster but full of errors, not really that useful.

Hopefully it is the first one: it is faster and more accurate.
Score: 26 Votes (Like | Disagree)
neuropsychguy Avatar
11 weeks ago

Impressive, if it is accurate. What the story doesn't mention is how accurate each of those transcriptions was? Were they all identical? Did one or other have more mistakes? What is the accuracy percentage for each one, and how badly wrong were those mistakes?

I'm not trying to defend ChatGPT, just the speed is a single metric, which isn't very useful if the results are garbage. If the Apple one is faster and more accurate, that is incredible, faster and as accurate, impressive, faster but full of errors, not really that useful.

Hopefully it is the first one: it is faster and more accurate.
Nothing scientific, but in the MacStories post: "What stood out above all else was Yap’s speed. By harnessing SpeechAnalyzer and SpeechTranscriber on-device, the command line tool tore through the 7GB video file a full 55% faster than MacWhisper’s Large V3 Turbo model, with no noticeable difference in transcription quality."

It would be good to see more formal comparisons with data you suggested. Also, it would be good to know what computer John was using for the test.
Score: 17 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Big_D Avatar
11 weeks ago

Impressive, if it is accurate.
OK, I read the original article, they all had similar problems with the podcast name, AppStories, writing it as two words instead of CamelCasing it, which is acceptable, and they all had similar problems with people's names. But the Apple tools weren't any less accurate, despite being much faster.
Score: 15 Votes (Like | Disagree)
jmonster Avatar
11 weeks ago
Not mentioning accuracy at all implies it's not. Lots of models are faster than O3, but they're not better.

This is just silly getting sillier. Write something meaningful.

Whisper works in real time. Anything faster is irrelevant for iOS.

And saying it's because network overhead? When you can run OpenAI's whisper locally?....... mhm.

This is a blatant advertisement just regurgitating apples marketing bullets.
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)
klasma Avatar
11 weeks ago
Speech-to-text is a good use case for on-device processing, but yes, accuracy is an important question, not to mention (multi-)language support.
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Basic75 Avatar
11 weeks ago

While the time difference might seem modest for individual files, Voorhees notes that the performance gain increases exponentially when processing multiple videos or longer content.
That's not how it works. Recommend maths lesson.
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)